<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Programming fonts you might not have tried</title>
	<atom:link href="http://damieng.com/blog/2007/04/09/programming-fonts-you-might-not-have-tried/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://damieng.com/blog/2007/04/09/programming-fonts-you-might-not-have-tried</link>
	<description>A Microsoft developer in Vancouver</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ?ükrü Uzel &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Visual Studio Code Editor ?emalar?</title>
		<link>http://damieng.com/blog/2007/04/09/programming-fonts-you-might-not-have-tried#comment-9369</link>
		<dc:creator>?ükrü Uzel &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Visual Studio Code Editor ?emalar?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damieng.com/blog/archive/2007/04/09/programming-fonts-you-might-not-have-tried.aspx#comment-9369</guid>
		<description>[...] VS kullan?rken editorun fontu sizi s?kmaya ba?lad? ise ayn? dertten yak?nan biriside burada http://damieng.com/blog/2007/04/09/Programming-fonts-you-might-not-have-tried    0 Comments Read [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VS kullan?rken editorun fontu sizi s?kmaya ba?lad? ise ayn? dertten yak?nan biriside burada <a href="http://damieng.com/blog/2007/04/09/Programming-fonts-you-might-not-have-tried"  rel="nofollow">http://damieng.com/blog/2007/04/09/Programming-fonts-you-might-not-have-tried</a>    0 Comments Read [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://damieng.com/blog/2007/04/09/programming-fonts-you-might-not-have-tried#comment-1836</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damieng.com/blog/archive/2007/04/09/programming-fonts-you-might-not-have-tried.aspx#comment-1836</guid>
		<description>Damien Guard shows a few other, less well-known monospaced fonts that have potential as programming fonts: Anonymous, Crystal, Onuava and Share Technical Monospaced....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damien Guard shows a few other, less well-known monospaced fonts that have potential as programming fonts: Anonymous, Crystal, Onuava and Share Technical Monospaced....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://damieng.com/blog/2007/04/09/programming-fonts-you-might-not-have-tried#comment-1835</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damieng.com/blog/archive/2007/04/09/programming-fonts-you-might-not-have-tried.aspx#comment-1835</guid>
		<description>on my jedit, crystal is only good at low point sizes, and onuava looks uuuugly like a bad 1920's typewriter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apprently I had an old version of monaco (2.0) and the one in the above mentioned post is 5.1, jedit b0rks on the 5.1..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anonymous vs Monaco at the same point size feels a little more more whitespacy and more spread out...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;keep us posted about envy code r&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on my jedit, crystal is only good at low point sizes, and onuava looks uuuugly like a bad 1920's typewriter.</p>
<p>Apprently I had an old version of monaco (2.0) and the one in the above mentioned post is 5.1, jedit b0rks on the 5.1..</p>
<p>Anonymous vs Monaco at the same point size feels a little more more whitespacy and more spread out...</p>
<p>keep us posted about envy code r</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
