<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL Server query plan cache &#8211; what is it and why should you care?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://damieng.com/blog/2009/12/13/sql-server-query-plan-cache/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://damieng.com/blog/2009/12/13/sql-server-query-plan-cache?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sql-server-query-plan-cache</link>
	<description>A .NET developer in silicon valley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://damieng.com/blog/2009/12/13/sql-server-query-plan-cache#comment-34329</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damieng.com/?p=1487#comment-34329</guid>
		<description>Good post. That cached plan query is really useful. 
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. That cached plan query is really useful.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew M</title>
		<link>http://damieng.com/blog/2009/12/13/sql-server-query-plan-cache#comment-32446</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damieng.com/?p=1487#comment-32446</guid>
		<description>It should be back-ported somehow :)
Nice work D!

- Matthew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be back-ported somehow :)<br />
Nice work D!</p>
<p>- Matthew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Guard</title>
		<link>http://damieng.com/blog/2009/12/13/sql-server-query-plan-cache#comment-32440</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Guard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damieng.com/?p=1487#comment-32440</guid>
		<description>Yes, it was a bug hence why it was fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it was a bug hence why it was fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei Rinea</title>
		<link>http://damieng.com/blog/2009/12/13/sql-server-query-plan-cache#comment-32436</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei Rinea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damieng.com/?p=1487#comment-32436</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why in .NET 3.5 SP1 the ORMs did not set the length of the variable type parameters. After all it knows the schema so there is no excuse there... And having the query plan cache for nothing and recompiling the plans at almost every query is a massive performance issue I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why in .NET 3.5 SP1 the ORMs did not set the length of the variable type parameters. After all it knows the schema so there is no excuse there&#8230; And having the query plan cache for nothing and recompiling the plans at almost every query is a massive performance issue I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

